Key words: Fear; Faith; Hope; Western philosophy; Theology; Virtue ethics; Existentialism; Discipline and power; Transcendence
Introduction:
The following work presents a brief exploration of fear and faith through the lens of historical theological evolution, tracing its journey from the early insights of Origen to the introspective depth brought forth by Augustine. Central to this examination is the transformative power of fear when rightly oriented towards the divine—a perspective that transpires from debilitating dread to a purifying force that paves the way for authentic faith. This short essay delve into these themes, it will uncover how Augustine's contemplations illustrate the critical interplay between human fallibility, divine truth, and the nature of belief, setting a framework for understanding faith as an epistemological priority essential to grasping transcendent revelations. By reflecting on these theological transformations, it seeks to illuminate the path where fear becomes an ally in the pursuit of faith, offering a rich backdrop against which the spiritual needs of each era can be deciphered. Additionally, it examines Thomas Aquinas and Nicholas of Cusa. Aquinas, representing medieval scholasticism, uses Aristotelian logic to present a rational view where well-ordered fear aids the soul's pursuit of God. Conversely, Cusanus counters with the Renaissance concept of docta ignorantia ("learned ignorance"), emphasizing the limits of human reason. This comparison highlights the historical shift from systematic theology to mystical insight regarding the divine.
The Pre-Constantinian Era (Martyrdom and Defense)
Origen of Alexandria (c. 185–254), an influential early Christian theologian, wrote during a time when Christianity was an illicit religion, often subject to sporadic but brutal persecution by the Roman Empire. This precarious existence shaped his theological reflections on how fear, whether as a paralyzing force or as reverential awe, interacts with faith and hope in the spiritual life. The threat of martyrdom was not abstract for Origen's community—it was a lived reality. His own father, Leonides, was martyred when Origen was still young, and Origen himself would later face torture under the Decian persecution. Against this backdrop of physical danger, Origen acknowledges that believers should not be disturbed, but still fear can have a wrong focus. He describes what he considers to be a wrong focus: "But we, if we fear death, we fear the antagonists, we transgress his commandment; therefore we are liable to punishment…." (Origen, 2020, p. 232). This martial language—"antagonists," the threat of death—reflects the historical reality that early Christians faced literal enemies who could end their lives. Fear of these temporal threats, Origen argues, distorts perception and represents a failure to trust in God's ultimate sovereignty. Yet Origen does not dismiss fear entirely. In an era when Christians needed to distinguish their worship from both pagan terror of capricious gods and the servile fear of Roman authority, he makes a crucial theological distinction between servile fear (terror) and filial fear (reverence), noting: "Those who fear God are midwives, serving as midwives to the offspring so that the works of virtue, good activities, may be perfect" (Origen, 2020, p. 407). This distinction allowed Christians to respect God's power while rejecting the "terror" of the Roman executioner. A proper fear of God, rooted in awe rather than dread, can deepen faith rather than undermine it—even when facing persecution.
For Origen, faith becomes the stabilizing force that protects the soul from fear's corrosive influence during this dangerous period. He employs martial imagery to illustrate this defensive function: "If the sinner's arrow is able to reach me, it is apparent that I have not made use of the shield of faith" (Origen, 2020, p. 100). This metaphor aligns with the Pauline depiction of faith as spiritual armor (Eph. 6:16), emphasizing its protective role against both physical threats and spiritual despair. In a context where Christians were literally being shot at with arrows in arenas, this imagery would have resonated powerfully. Origen was also battling Gnosticism and pagan philosophy during this period. Critics dismissed Christianity as irrational superstition. To counter this, Origen had to legitimize Christian faith as intellectually defensible. He further asserts: "Therefore, having faith is a reasonable thing, not so much on account of the Scriptures as on account of the cosmos and the order that is in it, in the one who made sky and earth and the things in them" (p. 289). By framing faith as "reasonable" and aligned with the observable "cosmos," Origen was responding to intellectual critics of his time who viewed Christianity as mere credulity. Origen presents faith as transformative, reshaping the believer's relationship with fear—turning terror into reverence, panic into perseverance. In this way, fear, when rightly directed, contributes to spiritual maturity even amid persecution.
The Decline of Rome and the Pelagian Controversy
A view which sets Origen in relation to Augustine of Hippo (354–430), who is fundamental for Western Christianity and who marks a dramatic shift from the external threat of persecution to the internal threat of sin. By Augustine's time, Christianity had become the official religion of the Roman Empire following Constantine's conversion. The age of martyrdom had largely passed, but new threats emerged: theological controversies, moral laxity within the now-respectable church, and the traumatic shock of Rome's decline (the Visigoths sacked Rome in 410 CE, during Augustine's lifetime). His theological anthropology reveals a nuanced understanding of fear as both a consequence of humanity's fallen condition and a potential catalyst for spiritual transformation. Augustine's battle against Pelagianism—the teaching that humans could achieve goodness through their own efforts without divine grace—fundamentally shaped his view of human nature as radically corrupted by the Fall. In his vision of Paradise, Augustine describes a state of prelapsarian harmony where "there was no excessive heat or cold, so its inhabitants were exempt from the vicissitudes of fear and desire" (Augustine, City of God, n.d., Book XIV, Chapter 26), establishing fear as fundamentally tied to humanity's post-Fall vulnerability and instability. The world is now broken, subject to "vicissitudes of fear and desire," and humans are entirely dependent on God's grace to navigate it.
Unlike Origen's focus on external antagonists like Roman persecutors, Augustine introduced a deep, autobiographical interiority to Western theology through his Confessions. For Augustine, the primary antagonist is internal—the corrupted self. Yet Augustine's personal spiritual journey demonstrates that fear, when properly oriented toward God, becomes transformative rather than debilitating. His confessional prayer, "I fear to deceive myself; lest mine iniquity lie unto itself. Therefore I contend not in judgment with Thee" (Augustine, Confessions, n.d., Book I, Chapter 5), illustrates what might be termed a salutary fear—one that acknowledges human fallibility and submits to divine truth rather than asserting autonomous judgment. This "salutary" (health-giving) fear purifies the ego, preventing the self-deception that Augustine saw as humanity's deepest danger. This purifying dimension of fear reaches its culmination in Augustine's conversion narrative. In Book VIII, Chapter XII of his Confessions, he describes fear not as paralyzing but purifying—a force that strips away pretension and prepares the soul for grace. For Augustine, faith emerges as both the antidote to destructive fear and the proper response to purifying fear. He declares: "My faith, Lord, shall call on Thee, which Thou hast given me, wherewith Thou hast inspired me, through the Incarnation of Thy Son" (Augustine, Confessions, n.d., Book I, Chapter I). This posits faith not as a human achievement but as divine gift—a necessary correction to the Pelagian confidence in human capability.
Because human reason was viewed as corrupted by the Fall, Augustine insisted that faith had to be an "epistemological priority"—meaning you must believe to understand, not the other way around. Chapter V of Book VI, named "Faith is the basis of human life; man cannot discover that truth which holy scripture has disclosed," establishes faith as epistemologically prior to reason, the necessary foundation for accessing revealed truth that transcends human rational capacity. This framework addressed the intellectual crisis of his age: if Rome could fall and human civilization prove so fragile, where could certainty be found? Augustine's answer: not in human reason or achievement, but in divine revelation received through faith.
The Rediscovery of Aristotle
Almost a millennium later, Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274), writing in the 13th century, represents the height of Scholasticism, a movement dedicated to reconciling Christian revelation with the newly rediscovered logic of Aristotle. The translation of Aristotle's works from Arabic into Latin had created both an intellectual crisis and opportunity for Western Christianity: how could the sophisticated philosophical system of a pagan Greek be integrated with Christian doctrine? Aquinas, deeply influenced by Aristotelian metaphysics, constructs a systematic and rational framework that also comments on the relationship between fear and faith. This was the era of the emerging University—institutions like Paris and Oxford where theology became an academic discipline requiring logical rigor. Aquinas was not writing for martyrs facing execution (like Origen) or spiritual seekers examining their souls (like Augustine), but for students of logic, theology professors, and ecclesiastical authorities who demanded systematic coherence. The Stanford Encyclopedia clarifies how he distinguishes: "Passions (passiones) are feeling-responses such as humans share with animals…Affections (affectiones), by contrast, are generated not in the sensory appetite, but in the will or intellectual appetite…" (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Emotions, n.d.). This taxonomic precision reflects the Scholastic method—defining terms with philosophical exactitude before constructing arguments.
Central to his argument is the assertion that fear, as an emotional response contingent upon potential evil, is fundamentally incompatible with the nature of God. Aquinas grounds this claim, made in his Summa contra Gentiles, in the ontological distinction between divine perfection and human finitude, employing Aristotelian metaphysics (specifically the concepts of Actuality versus Potentiality) to make what amounts to a logical deduction rather than merely a spiritual feeling. He argues that God's absolute actuality precludes any susceptibility to evil: "But Fear regards an evil that may be imminent. In two ways then Fear, specifically as such, is removed from God, both because it supposes a subject that is in potentiality, and because it has for its object some evil that may come to be in the subject" (Aquinas, n.d., p. 141). This passage underscores Aquinas's metaphysical reasoning: since fear presupposes both potentiality (the capacity to be changed) and the possibility of evil, neither of which can pertain to an omnipotent and immutable God who is pure actuality, it is categorically excluded from divine experience. This is Aristotelian logic applied to theology—God is pure perfection, fear requires the potential for harm, therefore God cannot fear. Aquinas represents Cataphatic theology (affirmative theology)—the belief that we can use reason and logic to make positive statements about what God is and how human emotions (passions) relate to Him. Within his systematic framework, fear is not eradicated but rather subordinated to the higher virtue of love through a rational hierarchy of virtues. The indwelling of the Holy Spirit reorients human volition away from servile fear toward filial love, enabling believers to act freely in accordance with divine grace: "The Holy Ghost then, rendering us lovers of God, inclines us to act of our own will, freely, out of love, not as bondsmen prompted by fear. Ye have not received the spirit of bondage again in fear, but ye have received the spirit of adoption as sons" (Aquinas, n.d., p. 610). Aquinas quotes Romans 8:15 and situates fear within the broader teleology of human existence, arguing that the theological virtues—faith, hope, and charity—dispose the soul toward its ultimate end: the beatific vision of God. He elaborates: "The whole care therefore that God has of man is in view of preparing his mind for the fruition of God, whereunto the mind is prepared by faith, hope and charity: for by faith man's mind is disposed to recognise God as a Being above himself: by hope it is strengthened to reach out to Him and see in Him man's true good: by charity it fixes upon Him so as immovably to adhere to Him" (Aquinas, n.d., p. 518). This dynamic tension between present faith and future fulfillment encapsulates Aquinas's teleological optimism: fear, when properly ordered within a rational system of virtues, gives way to the soul's restful pursuit of God. Aquinas, therefore, presents a coherent and rational account of fear and faith that satisfied the intellectual demands of the university system and the Scholastic method.
The Limits of Scholasticism and the Rise of Mysticism
Nicholas of Cusa (1401–1464), the Renaissance philosopher and theologian, bridges the medieval and modern worlds. His views represent a reaction against the rigid rationalism of Aquinas and the Scholastic enterprise. By Cusanus's time, scholars had begun to realize that human logic and Aristotelian categories had inherent limits—particularly when confronting the infinite. The Renaissance sparked a renewed interest in Neoplatonism, mysticism, and the recognition that God's transcendence might exceed the capacity of systematic theology. Cusanus opposes Aquinas's rational view by developing a theological framework that interrogates the relationship between faith and fear through the lens of divine incomprehensibility. His understanding of God is predicated upon docta ignorantia ("learned ignorance"), a state in which faith surpasses finite human comprehension. This concept emerged from the Renaissance realization that the confident systematization of the Scholastics might itself be a form of intellectual hubris. He articulates this notion with precision: "And it always directs its worship by faith, which it attains more truly through learned ignorance. It believes that He whom it worships as one is All-in-one, and that He whom it worships as Inaccessible Light is not light as is corporeal light, to which darkness is opposed, but is infinite and most simple Light, in which darkness is Infinite Light; and [it believes] that Infinite Light always shines within the darkness of our ignorance but [that] the darkness cannot comprehend it. And so, the theology of negation is so necessary for the theology of affirmation that without it God would not be worshiped as the Infinite God but, rather, as a creature. And such worship is idolatry; it ascribes to the image that which befits only the reality itself. Hence, it will be useful to set down a few more things about negative theology" (Cusanus, 1981, p. 45). Cusanus establishes the necessity of via negativa (negative theology) as an epistemological precondition for true worship, arguing that any attempt to conceptualize God through affirmative statements alone—as the Scholastics attempted—is a theological error tantamount to idolatry. His "theology of negation" (Apophatic theology) argues that God is so infinite that our logical affirmations, however sophisticated, are essentially acts of "idolatry" because they reduce the Infinite to finite categories. Cusanus elaborates an apophatic approach, while Aquinas stands for a cataphatic theology. This represents a fundamental epistemological shift in response to Scholasticism's perceived limitations.
Cusanus asserts that divine causality cannot be circumscribed by empirical or representational means. He states: "Although God, whether in order to make His goodness known (as the religious maintain), or because of the fact that [He is] maximum, absolute Necessity, or for some other reason, created the world, which obeys Him (so that there are those who are compelled and who fear Him and whom He judges), it is evident that He neither assumes another form (since He is the Form of all forms) nor appears through positive signs (since these signs themselves, in regard to their own being, would likewise require other signs through which [to appear], and so on ad infinitum)" (Cusanus, Book Two, 1981, p. 64). This passage reflects the Renaissance critique of representational knowledge—an infinite regress problem that troubled thinkers who were beginning to question the certainties of medieval synthesis. Otherwise, than Aquinas offers, Cusanus's theology presents a hierarchical structure of cognition, wherein faith serves as the necessary precondition for rational and intellectual progression. He delineates this dynamic as follows: "But if reason governs the senses, still it is necessary that the intellect govern reason in order that the intellect may adhere, by formed faith and above reason to the Mediator, so that it can be drawn unto glory by God the Father" (Cusanus, Book Three, 1981, p. 128). This schema posits faith as the mediating principle between reason and divine illumination—but critically, while Aquinas used reason to support faith, Cusanus argues that reason must eventually "humble" itself before the transcendent mystery.
Cusanus's reiteration of the principle that "All our forefathers unanimously maintain that faith is the beginning of understanding" (Cusanus, Book Three, 1981, p. 143) underscores the axiomatic role of faith in his theological epistemology. This assertion is not a doctrinal recapitulation but a methodological claim: just as all intellectual disciplines rely on indemonstrable first principles that must be accepted a priori, so too does theology require faith as its foundational premise. The invocation of Isaiah's dictum: "Unless you believe, you will not understand," serves as both a scriptural warrant and a philosophical imperative that challenges the Scholastic confidence in reason's autonomy. In the Renaissance context, where thinkers began exploring the Coincidentia Oppositorum (the coincidence of opposites)—paradoxes that transcend logical resolution—Cusanus's attitude toward faith and fear is one of dialectical reconciliation and does not have these Aristotelian traits as those of Aquinas. Fear, in his theology, emerges not as a paralyzing dread but as an initial recognition of divine transcendence, a necessary humbling of human reason before the ineffable. Fear, in this historical context, becomes the intellectual awe one feels when realizing that the Infinite God cannot be captured by a finite human mind—not even the sophisticated mind trained in Scholastic method. In this way, Cusanus's theology offers a sophisticated resolution to the tension between faith and fear that reflects the Renaissance's simultaneous appreciation for and skepticism toward medieval rationalism.
Conclusion
The historical contexts that shaped Origen, Augustine, Aquinas, and Cusanus produced profoundly different—yet complementary—understandings of fear and faith, demonstrating how theological reflection evolves in response to changing intellectual and social pressures. Origen, writing under the shadow of persecution, saw faith as a shield against external threats and rightly-ordered fear as reverence that strengthens courage in the face of martyrdom. Augustine, writing amid Rome's decline and the church's internal theological battles, understood fear as emerging from humanity's fallen condition, with faith as the divine gift that transforms interior corruption into humble dependence on grace.
Nearly a millennium later, the transition from Aquinas to Cusanus represents a profound shift in intellectual history. Aquinas's Scholastic confidence that reason could systematically articulate divine truth through Aristotelian categories reflected the optimism of the medieval university system. Where Aquinas used logic to subordinate fear within a rational hierarchy of virtues, his contemporary Cusanus—standing at the threshold of the Renaissance—embraced fear as the appropriate response to encountering the limits of human comprehension. Cusanus's Renaissance humility before divine mystery challenged the Scholastic enterprise itself, arguing that the Infinite cannot be captured by finite rational systems. Together, these four theologians demonstrate how historical pressures shape theological responses across more than a millennium—from the physical courage required under Roman persecution, to the psychological interiority needed amid civilization's collapse, to the systematic rationality of the medieval university, and finally to the mystical wonder of the Renaissance mind confronting infinity. Throughout these transformations, one constant emerges: fear, when properly understood and oriented, can become a pathway rather than an obstacle to authentic faith. Whether as reverential awe before God's power, salutary self-knowledge, rationally ordered emotion, or intellectual humility before mystery, fear serves not to undermine faith but to deepen it, adapting to meet the spiritual and intellectual needs of each era.
References
1. Origen. Homilies on the Psalms. Translated by J. Scherer. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2020.
2. Augustine of Hippo. The City of God. Translated by M. Dods. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, n.d.
3. Augustine of Hippo. Confessions. Translated by E. B. Pusey. London: J. M. Dent, n.d.
4. Aquinas, T. Summa Contra Gentiles. Translated by J. Rickaby. London: Saint Patrick Basilica, 2016.
5. Cusanus, N. De Docta Ignorantia. Translated by J. Hopkins. Minneapolis: Arthur J. Banning Press, 1981.
|
Голосування 
Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Знайшли помилку? Виділіть помилковий текст мишкою і натисніть Ctrl + Enter